Skip to main content

“HAVE A HUG”

I heard on the radio that the first week of June has been designated national "Give-Someone-a-hug-Week".
At first this sounds like it should be a good idea. Hugs are warm, fuzzy, touchy-feely things that allow us to break through inhibitory social barriers. However, upon further reflection, it becomes clear that indiscriminate hugging is not necessarily good. For example, an employer hugging an employee could be interpreted as sexual harassment and lead to a lawsuit. Hugging in the workplace could distract employees and decrease productivity.
Hugging someone who doesn't want to be hugged can be a daunting proposition. He or she may be hard to catch, and may require a surprise hug. Certainly there are people who will take hugging to extremes.....hugging the mailman, the garbage man and so forth. Suppose Safeway (our local “friendly” grocery store) were to get wind of the hug craze? Can you imagine being asked "Paper, plastic, or a hug?" Others may stand in line without a purchase just to get the hug. I foresee signs in stores stating: “No Hug without a Purchase”, or “No Shoes, No Shirt, No Hug”.
Suppose someone with body odor or lice wants to hug you? You'd have to discover tactful ways to avoid such hugs. Emily Post could have a field day on hug etiquette. Seriously, giving a hug takes a certain amount of social grace. The timing, the amount of pressure applied, the placement of each arm all require coordination and consideration. A "How-To" manual* is available for those who feel a bit rusty about their hugging skills.
Hugs can be dangerous. Some people hug too hard, and this can result in injury. I'm definitely staying away from the weight room at my gym that week.
My husband was recently hugged by a female acquaintance who gave him a firm, full body-contact hug that seemed to go on for an eternity. I did not like that. I was surprised, in fact, at how much I did not like that. (As I said, hugs can be dangerous.)
How about chiropractors and massage therapists? Will they charge for their hugs?
What if some deranged individual goes on a hug rampage? Can charges be brought against gangs who rove about giving group hugs to unwilling recipients?
Whoever thought of "Give-Someone-A-Hug-Week" clearly did not consider all the possible ramifications. At this very moment that person must be realizing that this idea is foolish, inappropriate and downright dangerous. He must feel terrible. He is probably sitting alone, hanging his head and regretting ever having been born. Sounds like he needs a hug.
*To order the manual please send $150.00 to E. Dalton, 2800 Harris St. Eureka, 95503


* * * * *
Editor’s note:
Can you imagine the government bureaucracy that would spring up? Whole new volumes of OSHA (Occupational Safety and Hug Act) regulations would have to be written. Eventually, hugs would be licensed and taxed: “A Hug without a license, go to jail.” The Kafkaesque ramifications are endless.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cash for Clunkers and EMR's

Our household has had the dubious honor of being deeply and directly affected by some of the major initiatives contained in the economic stimulus package. My husband, who is a sales manager at Mid City Motor world has been working long, busy days trying to accommodate the rush of car buyers flooding in to take advantage of the “Cash for Clunkers” program, while our pediatric office, with the promise of future reimbursement for “meaningful use” of an EMR, has begun the process of converting to electronic medical records. The cash for clunkers program is meant to reduce carbon emissions by encouraging people to turn in gas guzzlers and purchase more fuel efficient vehicles, but questions remain as to the overall benefit. Cash for Clunkers does not reduce, recycle or reuse in the least. The clunkers must be destroyed and sent to landfills,—so no used vehicles come out of the transactions to sell again, and no parts can be gleaned for resale. Jobs involved with used car sales and p
Response to the North Coast Journal article on health care reform I am a local pediatrician and I really enjoyed reading Alan Sanborn's salient and entertaining article in favor of health reform. I, too, am an advocate of a single payer system because I can see no other way to improve care and contain costs. There is fat in the system, but it belongs to: INSURANCE COMPANIES (most of these companies keep about 20% of the premiums thay take in for themselves in the form of administartive costs and profit), MALPRACTICE LAWYERS and PHARMACUETICAL COMPANIES. Without fundamental reform, including tort reform, much of the money put into the system will not go towards health care essentials. To rebut Ron Ross, the comparison between running health care and running a company is not a comparison that works, because there are fundamental differences between some one with cancer who needs treatment, and some one who would like to mail a package (i.e. the Fed Ex example). Health

Parable of the Pizza Shop

One day a man decided to open a pizza shop.  The first week he sold pizzas, collected money from his customers; the happy customers ate hot pizza and business was good. The next week many of his customers who came in had pizza insurance, and had already paid Blue Wall Insurance for their pizzas.  Since so many of his customers had purchased pizza insurance, the man signed a contract with Blue Wall agreeing to discount his pizzas in return for a larger volume of customers.  And so it went with United Pizza Insurance, PizzaNet and Pizzaetna.   Pretty soon the man started having trouble getting the pizza insurance companies to pay for the pizzas he sold, and he had to wait a few months for his payment.  They also started meddling with his cooking and trying to dictate what toppings he could use.  They even restricted the use of some of the more expensive ingredients.  He had to hire extra employees to fill out forms and paperwork they required before they would reimburse him.  Th